)
When
I heard of President Mahama’s decision to transfer the two former Gitmo
detainees to Ghana on grounds of compassion, my reaction was, this better be
good. What’s more is that the president was described in many circles as
peace-loving, compassionate, and a unifier who’s agreed to accommodate people
rejected by their own country, Yemen.
What
rattled me beyond the cloud of compassion was when I heard officials from the
U.S Embassy in Accra contradict the storyline the Ghana government nearly
succeeded in selling to its citizens – that the U.S government would foot the
expenses of the two. Now I began to ask myself: was the president really moved
by compassion to agree this deal or was he given or promised something in
return? Why were the Ministers of Interior and Foreign Affairs left out in this
deal? And why didn’t the president notify the People’s Representatives in the
Ghana Parliament before acquiescing to the deal? Did President Mahama know this
year is an election year? So why didn’t the U.S government agree to host the
two former terrorists when it has all it takes to protect its people? Or was this
shady deal the case of a superior nation versus an inferior nation? The absence
of convincing answers to these questions shows how the nation was mortgaged by
the President and some of his praise singing ministers. Leadership has become
cheap in our part of the world indeed.
I
am terrified for Ghana – more especially with the manner the leadership of the
nation went about the whole deal. Recent revelations and contradictions by
government functionaries – who lack basic information about the agreement – on the
one hand and officials of the U.S Embassy in Accra on the other hand are
indications of how bad the whole deal stinks. Government buying into cheap
information from the U.S administration is worrying. To be convinced that
Khalid al-Dhuby, 34, and Mahmoud Omar Bin Atef, 36, are of no security threat
to Ghana and its neighbors is to pass for a dummy. Mahmoud Omar Bin Atef, 36,
is described by Western Media as having a lot of disciplinary infractions while
at Guantanamo Bay – so how can we be sure that he’s changed. These are persons
motivated by their faith to maim even their own people who disagree with them.
How much more Ghana?
There
are three possible consequences this dummy action by President Mahama is likely
to have on the nation, especially, considering the poor nature of our security
system. First, we have granted, an unimpeded access to all sorts of groups to
visit mayhem on our innocent people – Al Qaeda, AQUIM, IS, Isis, Boko Haram,
Ansar-al-Din, Al Shabab, and Ansar-al-Sharia. Agreeing to host the duo is an invitation
of trouble on ourselves. Second, the group these former Gitmo detainees belong
could decide, for any other reason, to let them sneak out of Ghana – which per
the action of the four U.S Senators would be dire for Ghana. Third, these
groups may decide to use their former members to start a camp in Ghana, hence
recruiting young Ghanaians into their ranks increasing the risk to the country
and its neighbors.
President
Mahama’s hands are tied in this deal. His reactions tell it all. I don’t see
him going back to the negotiation table with the leadership of the U.S
government to re-negotiate this agreement any time soon. This is why his
party’s communication team members have been charged to attack anyone who
disagrees with the president’s decision – a very bad one for a leader. What
makes Americans more human than Ghanaians? Or perhaps they drink clean water
whiles we drink blood here? There’s something with the thinking of our leaders
and people.
No comments:
Post a Comment